Comparison
قناة فسنجون vs ابن بابل
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @fasngon | @iraqed4 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3.2M | 3.5M |
| Avg views | 13M | 771,898 |
| Engagement rate | 403.0% | 21.8% |
| 30-day growth | +0.3% | -2.8% |
| Language | العربية | العربية |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2239 days | 2593 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@fasngon
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@iraqed4
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.